- When someone experiences a cardiac arrest, their heart stops and they often lose some degree of brain function, either temporarily or long-term, making it necessary for someone to make decisions for them.
- Family members of people who survive cardiac arrest are often quickly placed in a position to make decisions concerning their loved one’s medical care.
- New research indicates that family members and caregivers often experience emotional distress due to the new responsibilities, and interventions that provide support, education and guidance throughout their loved one’s recovery process may be beneficial.
Embargoed until 4 a.m. CT/5 a.m. ET, Monday, Nov. 6, 2023
(NewMediaWire) – November 06, 2023 – DALLAS — Family members or loved ones who must make treatment decisions for people who have survived cardiac arrest benefited greatly from resources and interventions to help guide their decisions and provide support for them throughout the recovery process, according to preliminary research to be presented at the American Heart Association’s Resuscitation Science Symposium 2023. The meeting, to be held Nov. 11-12 in Philadelphia, is a premier global exchange of the most recent advances related to treating cardiopulmonary arrest and life-threatening traumatic injury.
According to the American Heart Association, cardiac arrest occurs suddenly and often without warning when the heart’s electrical system malfunctions, which causes the heart to stop beating. People who experience cardiac arrest outside of a hospital setting and survive typically have some level of physical, cognitive and emotional effects, some of which can linger for months or years. Often a family member or a loved one must become a surrogate decision-maker due to temporary or permanent loss of brain function after the cardiac arrest.
“As systems, processes and education surrounding emergency procedures and treatment for cardiac arrest improve, the number of people who survive a sudden cardiac arrest is increasing,” said Katie Dainty, Ph.D., a member of the American Heart Association CPR and ECC guidelines writing group and research chair in patient-centered outcomes at North York General Hospital in Toronto, Canada. “While survival from cardiac arrest looks different for each patient, there are numerous decisions that must be made surrounding that person’s acute and long-term medical treatment, psycho-social needs and recovery. In many ways, family members and surrogate decision-makers are ‘co-survivors’ of this life-altering event and it is crucial that we turn our attention to understanding their evolving emotional, physical and informational needs as they navigate their new life and roles.”
Studies from two different research groups focus on supporting surrogate decision-makers for cardiac arrest survivors:
The Tool To Empower (TEMPO) Surrogate Decision Makers Of Comatose Survivors Of Cardiac Arrest: A Pilot Trial Of A Novel Decision Tool (Abstract 288)
In a study to evaluate the effectiveness of an informational pamphlet, researchers tested the Tool to EMPOwer Surrogate Decision Makers (TEMPO) brochure. They enrolled 41 families to determine if, after receiving the information, family members of people who had survived cardiac arrest, felt like they were more knowledgeable and better able to make decisions regarding their loved ones’ care.
The family members completed a brief 8-question knowledge questionnaire on the day their loved one experienced cardiac arrest prior to being given the TEMPO pamphlet. They were then asked to complete the same questionnaire approximately 24 hours after reviewing the pamphlet.
Researchers questioned the participants on their knowledge, feelings of self-efficacy in decision making and acceptability of the pamphlet. Overall, they found that caregiver knowledge improved, and participants felt empowered to make decisions after reviewing the pamphlet.
About 85% of the study participants found the TEMPO pamphlet to be useful and 91% responded that it made choices they had to make concerning their loved one’s care easier.
“Prior research has shown that families do desire information regarding the event that their loved one’s have just experienced” said lead author Sarah Perman, M.D., M.S.C.E., an associate professor of emergency medicine at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut. “Supporting decision makers during post-cardiac arrest care has been identified as an area where medical care is deficient, and looking ahead, we intend to conduct a larger trial of TEMPO that will test the parameters from this study, in addition to evaluating patient and decision makers’ physical and emotional outcomes.”
- Three quarters of the study participants were women.
- Participants self-selected race/ethnicity and included 54% white people, 22% Black people and 24% Hispanic people.
- The participants’ relationships with the patients varied with almost half (44%) being spouses. The other surrogate caregivers’ relationships to patients were categorized as siblings (17%), adult children (17%) or parent (12%).
Co-authors, disclosures and funding sources are listed in the abstract.
A Prospective Evaluation Of Indicators Of Psychological Distress In Surrogates Of Cardiac Arrest Survivors (Abstract 285)
This study assessed the prevalence of psychological distress among surrogate caregivers of people who survived cardiac arrest, and then determined what forms of resources were considered most helpful by the surrogates of cardiac arrest patients.
Each surrogate caregiver completed an assessment when the patient was discharged from the hospital. The evaluation was conducted by a medical professional and included questions from the Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist 5, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 and the Patient Health Questionnaire-8.
The assessments indicated most of the study participants reported some form of psychological distress, with 66% experiencing anxiety; 29% experiencing characteristics of PTSD, and 57% showing signs of moderate depression.
“Past research has proven that surrogates and other family members are highly afflicted by psychological stressors of their loved one being hospitalized, and our results showed an abnormal amount of our study group with psychological distress because of the event,” said lead study author Isabella Tincher, B.A., a research coordinator at Columbia University in New York City.
Eight potential interventions were also presented to the surrogate caregivers through a survey tool. Four of the interventions focused on information surrounding the patient’s recovery and four of the interventions related to the psychological well-being and coping ability of the surrogates themselves.
Participants ranked their top choice among the eight interventions with 22% of surrogate caregivers ranking “increased access to the care team” as the most helpful intervention. The next most highly prioritized intervention was “increased information on potential recovery,” which was chosen by 20% of the participants.
“Recovery from an acute event is a traumatic experience that affects all that witness and aid in the recovery,” said Tincher. “While it is important to focus on the recovery of the patient, the patient is ultimately discharged from the hospital, so it is important that we are taking a holistic approach through assessing the social determinants of health that may be impacting the patient and their family.”
- The research was conducted from 2021 to 2023 and included 83 family members of cardiac arrest patients, who were considered surrogate decision makers in the study.
- Study participants self-selected gender and race/ethnicity and included 66% female and 41% of the participants were white people; 25% were Black people; and 31% were Hispanic/Latino people.
Co-authors, disclosures and funding sources are listed in the abstract.
Statements and conclusions of studies that are presented at the American Heart Association’s scientific meetings are solely those of the study authors and do not necessarily reflect the Association’s policy or position. The Association makes no representation or guarantee as to their accuracy or reliability. Abstracts presented at the Association’s scientific meetings are not peer-reviewed, rather, they are curated by independent review panels and are considered based on the potential to add to the diversity of scientific issues and views discussed at the meeting. The findings are considered preliminary until published as a full manuscript in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
The Association receives funding primarily from individuals; foundations and corporations (including pharmaceutical, device manufacturers and other companies) also make donations and fund specific Association programs and events. The Association has strict policies to prevent these relationships from influencing the science content. Revenues from pharmaceutical and biotech companies, device manufacturers and health insurance providers and the Association’s overall financial information are available here.
About the American Heart Association
The American Heart Association is a relentless force for a world of longer, healthier lives. We are dedicated to ensuring equitable health in all communities. Through collaboration with numerous organizations, and powered by millions of volunteers, we fund innovative research, advocate for the public’s health and share lifesaving resources. The Dallas-based organization has been a leading source of health information for nearly a century. Connect with us on heart.org, Facebook, X or by calling 1-800-AHA-USA1.
For Media Inquiries and AHA Expert Perspective:
AHA Communications & Media Relations in Dallas: 214-706-1173; email@example.com
Sarah Williams: 214-706-1156; firstname.lastname@example.org
For Public Inquiries: 1-800-AHA-USA1 (242-8721)