News

The history of presidential Fed-bashing suggests it has not been a fruitful strategy

Everett Collection


President Lyndon Johnson and Vice President Hubert Humphrey at a barbecue victory celebration on the LBJ ranch in November 1964.

(Editor’s word: This story was first revealed on Oct. 24.)

When speaking about presidents utilizing the Federal Reserve as a punching bag, it is at all times helpful to start on the profession of former Fed Chairman William McChesney Martin, who was almost actually become a punching bag by President Lyndon Johnson.

The concern has come again to the fore with President Donald Trump’s barrage of criticism for the Federal Reserve and its chairman, Jerome Powell.

Read: Trump calls Fed ‘too cute’ in third straight day of criticism

In late 1965, the Fed raised short-term charges, alarmed by indicators of inflation after tax cuts and with the struggle in Vietnam ramping up.

Johnson summoned Martin to his ranch and proceeded to bully him in an try to get the Fed to reverse course.

Johnson “physically shoved [Martin] around the living room,” saying he didn’t care concerning the boys in Vietnam, stated Sebastian Mallaby, the creator of a new biography about former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan.

Martin did not again down and the low cost price rose in early 1966 for the primary time in 5 years.

Martin’s biographer, Robert Bremner, wrote that the Fed chairman “admitted later that he was shaken but determined to stick to his position and not to insult the president of the United States.”

Vincent Reinhart, a former high aide to Greenspan, thinks the LBJ episode reveals public criticism of the Fed “is counterproductive.”

“They’re telling everyone they want to influence you. A public rebuke can’t be brooked by anyone who cares about credibility. You don’t want to be seen caving to political pressure,” Reinhart stated.

Irwin Morris, a professor on the University of Maryland who has studied presidents and the Fed, agreed.

“The short answer is that there is relatively little evidence that the Fed responds to short-term presidential efforts to micromanage its monetary policy activities,” Morris stated in an electronic mail.

The greatest it can do for a president is “shift blame” away from an administration, Morris stated.

Reinhart stated White House affect on the Fed has at all times been extra vital when it was achieved “through the back channel.”

The Nixon tapes reveal that President Richard Nixon pressured Fed Chairman Arthur Burns to take easing actions forward of the 1972 election. Although it stays controversial, many economists assume Burns relented to the strain.

Former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker has written a memoir to be launched later this month that reveals President Reagan’s chief of employees James Baker ordered him not to lift rates of interest forward of the 1984 election. Volcker stated he wasn’t planning to tighten however stated he was “stunned.”

Read: Volcker says he’s already worried about next financial crisis

Reinhart stated the discussions between Nixon and Burns captured on tape are “cringing.” But he stated Burns thought there was room for stimulus anyway.

“Nixon was pushing on a partly open door,” he stated.

The Trump White House is not a “back channel” administration, and everybody knew Trump would slam the Fed, Reinhart stated.

“It is hard to say why there has been such a market reaction to this,” he stated.

Trump continued to take goal at Powell on Tuesday. In a Wall Street Journal interview, the president stated that Powell “almost looks like he’s happy raising interest rates.”

Read: Trump escalates attack on Powell

Earlier this month, Trump opened fireplace on the Fed in an interview on the Fox Business Network.

Trump referred to as the Fed his “biggest threat” and stated he wasn’t proud of Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, and prompt he additionally wasn’t proud of Fed Vice Chairman for Bank Supervision Randal Quarles and Fed Vice Chairman Richard Clarida, each of whom have voted for greater charges.

“I put [Powell] there and maybe it’s right, maybe it’s wrong, but I put him there. I put a couple of other people there I’m not happy with too,” Trump stated.

Reinhart stated it would matter if Trump appears on the three remaining open Fed seats and modifications the nominations.

So far, Trump’s nominees have been “supportive” of Powell, Reinhart stated.The president has the authority to fill seven of the eight Fed board positions.

Trump reached into the 2 Bush administrations for his first three Fed nominations, together with Powell, Quarles and Clarida.

The Senate Banking Committee has authorised two different of Trump’s Fed nominees: Michelle Bowman, a Kansas banking regulator, and Carnegie Mellon University economist Marvin Goodfriend, however they await a full Senate vote. The president final month nominated former Fed economist Nellie Liang to the board of governors.

Source link

Tags
Show More

Related Articles

Back to top button
Close